Talk:Nile Online Icons
From Nile Online Wiki
Removed "The players of Osiriskai have only ever had this event once!!!!!". It doesn't seem relevant to this article. --Zhila 21:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Duplicated content: Communications, Monument sites, Capital city, Nome events. Should we remove this article? --Blinkkin 20:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's really what I've been saying all along! --Agamemnus 05:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Signing
Spey, you're never supposed to sign an article you made. =( Amun Nefer 21:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC) forgot the signature...
Bad idea
I'm going to remove this in a bit.... if you want this:
- categorize the icon images
- add a more detailed description to the images
- add a link to the icon category
--Agamemnus 21:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see much need for actually removing the article, as it doesn't do any harm. If it is found to be to have too much duplicated content, removing the links from the main page would suffice. --Andrelvis 21:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- If the icon images are categorized instead, that would serve the same purpose and would be much more useful.--Agamemnus 21:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's not about how useful it is. It doesn't do any bad for the wiki, I doubt the article byte size would be great enough to be an issue. It doesn't have outdated information that could be harmful to players reading the article either. The only problem is main page space, which is valuable. Hence, if you feel that this is useless, just remove the link from the main page, but the article be. --Andrelvis 22:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Potentially harmful outdated information. If it is useless or can be done in a much better form, it needs to go!--Agamemnus 22:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's not about how useful it is. It doesn't do any bad for the wiki, I doubt the article byte size would be great enough to be an issue. It doesn't have outdated information that could be harmful to players reading the article either. The only problem is main page space, which is valuable. Hence, if you feel that this is useless, just remove the link from the main page, but the article be. --Andrelvis 22:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- If the icon images are categorized instead, that would serve the same purpose and would be much more useful.--Agamemnus 21:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- "Description of game screen" could be useful, but content of it should be linked or included (much more like) from other articles.--Blinkkin 21:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that an interface page or something similar could be useful. Have a description of each button and link to the article pertaining to it. --Zhila 21:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm just giving a base line of what the final page will be. You are just supposed to edit it until all icons are represented and described well.--Speysider
- Ya, but a simple categorization of the icon images would serve the same purpose. Perhaps an "interface page" might be useful, as Zhila suggested. However, the interface is really easy to use, so I dunno... Also, please sign your messages so people know who posted...--Agamemnus 06:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
